The Slave Narrative Collection
An OKGenWeb Special Project
 

     Slave Narratives from the Federal Writers' Project, 1936-1938
Oklahoma Narratives, Volume XIII (369 pages)

A Folk History of Slavery in the United States
From Interviews with Former Slaves

Adams, Isaac | Alexander, Alice | Anderson, Sam
Banks, Frances | Banks, Phoebe | Banks, Phoebe (2)  | Banks, Sina | Barber, Mollie | Bean, Joe | Bean Nancy | Bean, Nancy (2) | Bee, Prince | Bell, Eliza  | Bethel, William | Bonner, Lewis | Bridges, Frances | Brown, John | Burns, Robert
Carder, Sallie | The Slave Narrative Collection
                    

We strongly recommend that you read the information below from the Library of Congress explaining the language used in these interviews. 

OKGenWeb

The Slave Narrative Collection that has been transcribed as they were written. The language and descriptive portions are as the interviewer transcribed them for the narrative collection; writing the language as spoken by the people they interviewed 

Library of Congress

The following information is statements from the Library of Congress about the Slave Narratives and U.S. Government employee created materials.

  Notes on the Language of the Narratives

Library of Congress and the Project Editor

The Slave Narrative Collection in the Manuscript Division at the Library of Congress consists of narrative texts derived from oral interviews. The narratives usually involve some attempt by the interviewers to reproduce in writing the spoken language of the people they interviewed, in accordance with instructions from the project's headquarters, the national office of the Federal Writers' Project in Washington, D.C.

The interviewers were writers, not professionals trained in the phonetic transcription of speech. And the instructions they received were not altogether clear. "I recommend that truth to idiom be paramount, and exact truth to pronunciation secondary," wrote the project's editor, John Lomax, in one letter to interviewers in sixteen states. Yet he also urged that "words that definitely have a notably different pronunciation from the usual should be recorded as heard," evidently assuming that "the usual" was self-evident.

In fact, the situation was far more problematic than the instructions from project leaders recognized. All the informants were of course black, most interviewers were white, and by the 1930s, when the interviews took place, white representations of black speech already had an ugly history of entrenched stereotype dating back at least to the early nineteenth century. What most interviewers assumed to be "the usual" patterns of their informants' speech was unavoidably influenced by preconceptions and stereotypes.

The result, as the historian Lawrence W. Levine has written, "is a mélange of accuracy and fantasy, of sensitivity and stereotype, of empathy and racism" that may sometimes be offensive to today's readers. Yet whatever else they may be, the representations of speech in the narratives are a pervasive and forceful reminder that these documents are not only a record of a time that was already history when they were created: they are themselves irreducibly historical, the products of a particular time and particular places in the long and troubled mediation of African-American culture by other Americans.

Copyright and Other Restrictions

The Library of Congress is not aware of any copyright restrictions for the materials presented in this collection. U.S. Government employees created the materials in this collection. Generally speaking, works created by U.S. Government employees are not eligible for copyright protection in the United States, although they may be under copyright in some foreign countries. The persons interviewed or whose words were transcribed were generally not employees of the U.S. Government.

Photographs in the online collection may originate from either the Prints and Photographs Division or the Manuscript Division. The record for each photograph specifies its custodial division.

© 2002 by OKGenWeb